MMN-o ✅⃠ on social.umeahackerspace.se
This remote profile is registered on another site; see mmn's original profile page on social.umeahackerspace.se.
-
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 18:01:43 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
Fördom nummer hundratjugoåtta: !dumpsterdiving i Norge innebär fisk och råolja.
Jag som svensk lever efter devisen "allt dumpstrat är veganskt" men om jag hade flyttat till Norge hade mitt motto istället varit "allt dumpstrat är förnybart".
"orka skaffa solpaneler, jag dumpstrar all olja jag behöver" -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 17:54:56 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
@moshpirit Copyrighted nude pics. -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 17:50:32 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
@adrienne I very much agree to that description of me. Users tend to have pretty lousy ideas. -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 17:49:10 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
I silenced already .) -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 17:31:38 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
@nanoha People still have to choose which communication client to use to participate in discussion with people they know. Some are on network A, some on network B etc. It's not like you stop communicating with people because they're using a different service than you, right? If it is, that's not a person I want to communicate with at all anyhow. -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 17:29:49 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
@nanoha I don't leave my social network (!GNUsocial) to communicate privately with people I have gotten to know here. Nor do I find it troublesome to use another piece of software (some !XMPP client) in parallell that is awesome and streamlined for private communication.
In fact, this distinction is great for usability and understandability. Also for privacy, security and organisation of communication. -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 17:01:37 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
"talk about personal issues and such" <- I don't think this should be done on a social network that is otherwise public.
If you want to talk about personal issues, use a mechanism where accidentally forgetting some check box or "misunderstanding" (or more like Facebook suddenly changing their definition of private) a policy won't land you in trouble. -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 16:23:40 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
Published a blog post and attached the media files from !umehack music hack jam: https://music.umeahackerspace.se/?p=141 -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 15:33:31 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
När det tar lika lång tid att läsa igenom introduktionen av en film som det tar att se den: http://www.magdalenanordin.se/blog/?p=19737 -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 14:46:21 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
@nanoha I did not know. Last time I checked, the "log in" alternative on the site turned into "log out" when you logged in. This was a couple of years ago. -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 14:41:25 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
@gargron conversation URIs are generated when a post without context is created (i.e. not a reply to anything and if incoming from another node, without the element rel="ostatus:conversation" element
Example: <link rel="ostatus:conversation" href="https://social.umeahackerspace.se/conversation/540660"/>
Source: https://social.umeahackerspace.se/api/statusnet/conversation/540660.atom
cc: @hannes2peer -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 14:18:03 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
@nanoha Private accounts (or instances) on !GNUsocial effectively disable federation. It just has to be clear to the user what you're missing out on (the clarity thing is something !GNUsocial doesn't live up to and I've been meaning to simply disable any option for "private stream" or "private post" and require explicit administrator interaction to even be able to enable it). -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 14:07:11 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
@gargron @hannes2peer I don't know the context for this post, but the conversation ID is NOT necessarily the thread's first notice ID. (anymore, it was only for a short while because I thought I had a bright idea that didn't turn out well in the long run) -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 14:04:12 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
^- as soon as people bring up centralised, commercial anti-privacy networks like T/F I use this argument. ;) @gargron -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 14:03:03 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
@sophia On services like Twitter and Facebook users are required to have only _one_ single account (on Twitter multiple accounts is allowed, but you need to verify with phone number and you can't be logged in to multiple identities at once - as you can easily do on a federated network). Facebook and Twitter offer no identity separation. Thus people feel the need to fin… -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 13:58:24 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
@paralithode Personally I think per-post filtering inevitably ends in confused users who thought something they posted was private but forgot to tick a little box and 10 seconds later it has federated across the internet and is public for anyone - and undeletable because it was published publicly. Mixing private and public in the same tool is bound to leak and the best… -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 13:56:18 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
@nanoha If the posts are seen publicly, which they are (and if they aren't, I would argue they shouldn't federate anyway), then disallowing subscription would be illogical (because I can just scrape your profile page). And, most importantly: in a _social_ network, you should be able to get to know the other person's feed before you subscribe or verify a subscription. T… -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 13:39:25 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
Music from the jam session in somewhat ok quality is available here: http://stuff.umeahackerspace.se/musichack/recordings/
Sorry for the 004 file where my recording didn't start until they started flipping out behind the synthesizers et. al! -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 13:33:27 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
@gargron Remember the UNIX philosophy of doing one thing and doing it well. Public and private are two wildly different beasts :) -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Nov-2016 13:32:57 EST
MMN-o ✅⃠
@geckojsc Points out the issue of asocial behaviour - a part of every social network - counteracting any attempt to introduce privacy.