Notices tagged with copyright, page 13
-
@redi44 but !copyright isn't justice, it is a suppression of liberty.
-
@mlinksva seems to me product designs wouldn't be under the purview of !copyright but #patent law (another IP sector we could do without)
-
!Copyright Chill: Amazon Pulls Self-Published Memoir About Star Wars Because It References “Star Wars” UPDATE !selfPUB http://ur1.ca/cg5jy
-
@laurelrusswurm agree. I dont think the us had better tv than the UK in the 60s.
-
@inscius Mainstream media tightens grip on culture worldwide so less good new work is produced/broadcast…variation reduces profit !copyright
-
@crosbie Corporations may not have natural rights, but these days we live in an articial world .... !copyright
-
@redi44 Personally, I don't feel "allowing you to go to court" constitutes protection. #expensive #timeconsuming #alienatesfans !copyright
-
@LaurelRusswurm Exempting individuals from#copyright means ALL human beings can enjoy their liberty. Corporations have no rights.
-
Exempting non-pro individuals from infringement by sacrificing the Liberty of professional creators submits to !copyright monopoly agenda
-
Those who believe people would wait out a short enough #copyright term are those seduced & corrupted by the monopoly. Liberty does not wait.
-
@crosbie If !copyright expired in reasa timely fashion, I think most would wait it out.
-
@crosbie exactly. And the supposed justification for copyright was to support creators to allow them to do just that.
-
People are not driven 'to risk infringing #copyright', but to share & build upon their own culture - instinctively - a natural imperative.
-
@crosbie these days perpetual copyright denies people access to their own culture, driving many to risk infringement, particularly creators
-
@crosbie Both term reduction and individual exemption would be good reforms, but could be construed as deckchair rearrangement
-
@crosbie I agree exempting private individuals from charges of !copyright infringement would be a good reform as well.
-
@crosbie indeed it never occurred to me !copyright *could* be abolished before reading your words. I didn't question copyright 'til recently
-
NB I am an abolitionist. I was commenting on your "if we must have #copyright, it s/b for short terms". Exempting individuals is far better.
-
@redi44 perhaps you can explain how !copyright "protects" your for-sale work…I don't think it does⇒ Copyright Fallacy #5 http://ur1.ca/bvojv
-
@crosbie !copyright law reform is at best a workaround… since © law varies globally, there is no #onesizefitsall solution (beyond abolition)