StatusNethttp://status.hackerposse.com/api/statusnet/conversation/123860.atomConversation2024-03-28T17:11:50-04:00http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/notetag:social.umeahackerspace.se,2017-06-17:noticeId=1202308:objectType=noteNew note by mmn@<a href="https://octodon.social/users/craigmaloney" class="h-card u-url p-nickname mention" title="Craig Maloney ☕">craigmaloney</a> No problem. Great post reminiscing the past btw!http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post2017-06-17T11:32:05+00:002017-06-17T11:32:05+00:00http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/personhttps://social.umeahackerspace.se/user/2mmnFree software and free culture fanatic.63.82842 20.25972mmnMMN-o ✅⃠Free software and free culture fanatic.Umeå, Swedenhomepagehttps://blog.mmn-o.se/truehttps://social.umeahackerspace.se/conversation/776239http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/notetag:social.umeahackerspace.se,2017-06-16:noticeId=1199485:objectType=noteNew note by mmn@<a href="https://octodon.social/users/craigmaloney" class="h-card u-url p-nickname mention" title="Craig Maloney ☕">craigmaloney</a> #<span class="tag"><a href="https://social.umeahackerspace.se/tag/statusnet" rel="tag">StatusNet</a></span> was not only released under the #<span class="tag"><a href="https://social.umeahackerspace.se/tag/gpl" rel="tag">GPL</a></span>, but the #<span class="tag"><a href="https://social.umeahackerspace.se/tag/agpl" rel="tag">AGPL</a></span> (Affero GPL). The AGPL was explicitly designed to also keep remote services free as in freedom. The GPL unfortunately doesn't defend rights when it comes to webservices etc. but (if I remember the legalese correctly) AGPL has the language of "conveying" instead of "distributing" etc.http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post2017-06-16T06:34:10+00:002017-06-16T06:34:10+00:00http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/personhttps://social.umeahackerspace.se/user/2mmnFree software and free culture fanatic.63.82842 20.25972mmnMMN-o ✅⃠Free software and free culture fanatic.Umeå, Swedenhomepagehttps://blog.mmn-o.se/truehttps://social.umeahackerspace.se/conversation/776239