StatusNethttp://status.hackerposse.com/api/statusnet/conversation/109729.atomConversation2024-03-29T05:52:31-04:00http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/notetag:fresh.federati.net,2016-11-18:noticeId=559891:objectType=commentNew note by lnxw48@<a href="http://quitter.se/user/115405" class="h-card mention" title="Dennis Andrew Gutowski Jr">capngloval</a> I'm a bit skeptical still. #<span class="tag"><a href="https://fresh.federati.net/tag/microsoft" rel="tag">Microsoft</a></span> has historically done much to harm #<span class="tag"><a href="https://fresh.federati.net/tag/foss" rel="tag">FOSS</a></span>, and #<span class="tag"><a href="https://fresh.federati.net/tag/gnu" rel="tag">GNU</a></span> + #<span class="tag"><a href="https://fresh.federati.net/tag/linux" rel="tag">Linux</a></span> in particular. For example, requiring a distribution to sign its releases with MSFT signed key in order for (most) people to replace the OS on hardware they own. <br /> <br /> I'm in favor of signing and hashes, but user / owner should decide whose keys to trust, not Microsoft.http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post2016-11-18T18:07:36+00:002016-11-18T18:07:36+00:00http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/personhttps://fresh.federati.net/user/54lnxw48lnxw48lnxw48 (Linux Walt)tag:quitter.se,2016-11-18:objectType=thread:nonce=068a099c4c59683d